I would have answered the same thing. In fact, scrolling on the list of mails you sent, I saw you answered 2 of them, but I did not even read what you wrote. I spend more time with people just quote part of the message to which they answer.
> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:20:46 +0000 > From: "Jimmy O'Regan" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Reply-To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] Apertium-stuff Digest, Vol 71, Issue 37 > > First of all... > > Replying to a digest email the way you did is a very good way to be > ignored, because your reply is buried in the middle of many emails > that have already been read. > > It also gives the impression that you are either too lazy or too > self-important to consider the time of the others on the list, who > have to search for your answer. Don't do that: that's not the > impression you want to give. > > Now... > > On 24 March 2013 04:14, Anand Soni <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry for using the wrong terminology. It is translation, not > > transliteration. I kind of changed the whole idea by using this word! I > > donot know how difficult that would be but, > > I *do* know, that's why I told you it's too difficult. Perhaps you > feel I'm underestimating you, because of your slip-up in terminology, > but let me assure you that this is not the case. This would be a > difficult project for an exceptional, experienced student. > > > I would definitely like to start > > working on this. I will keep asking things here and to my mentor if I get > > stuck. Also, I will definitely figure out things myself. But, this is the > > project that I would like to do as off now. If I change my idea, I will let > > you know. > > We can only accept a small fraction of the proposals we receive - if > we are even fortunate enough to be selected again - and given the > choice between an ambitious, but unrealistic, proposal that seems > likely to fail, and a more modest, but realistic, proposal that seems > likely to succeed, we, as mentors, will typically choose the latter. > > So your choice is this: pick a more realistic project, or make us > believe that *you* can make the project realistic. > > -- > <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? > <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > -------------------------------- Bernard Chardonneau (France) Phone : [33] 1 64 90 87 04 or [33] 9 72 36 32 90 (from Sept to June except holidays) GSM phone : [33] 6 49 95 13 95 (french scholl holidays, C zone) Multilingual websites for my free softwares : http://libremail.free.fr and http://libremail.tuxfamily.org http://cyloop.tuxfamily.org (mainly translated with Apertium) My general website (in french only) http://bech.free.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
