Hi Kevin, what do you mean by round-tripping in this case? Using only one tag instead of the two? If that, I am not sure; however, I presume the current compilers take advantage of the fact that there are two separate commands, so I believe it makes sense to retain that dichotomy.
David On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Kevin Donnelly <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dávid > > ::::On Thursday 04 July 2013 Dávid Nemeskey said:::: >> That's why I use the >> bset and mset tags in the xml, to get the word "list" out of the >> equation. > > Fair enough - so presumably you don't intend to allow round-tripping? > > -- > Pob hwyl / Best wishes > > Kevin Donnelly > kevindonnelly.org.uk > bangortalk.org.uk On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Kevin Donnelly <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dávid > > ::::On Thursday 04 July 2013 Dávid Nemeskey said:::: >> That's why I use the >> bset and mset tags in the xml, to get the word "list" out of the >> equation. > > Fair enough - so presumably you don't intend to allow round-tripping? > > -- > Pob hwyl / Best wishes > > Kevin Donnelly > kevindonnelly.org.uk > bangortalk.org.uk > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
