On 19 July 2013 17:49, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote: > One question: > > My preference is for lt-comp to parse both the .dix and the AT&T files. > > The behaviour would be: > > if(fileIsValidXML()) { > parse_xml > else if(fileIsValidATT()) { > parse_att > } else { > fail > } > > Would this be ok for people? > > * I'd prefer to have the AT&T compiler as part of lt-comp as opposed to > a separate program. > * I'd prefer it to work out the file format automatically rather than > for people to have to specify the format to compile from.
Er... why? 'lt-comp lr' and 'lt-comp rl' are presumably irrelevant, so why not make it 'lt-comp att' or whatever else makes sense. -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
