Hi, I did a check on apertium-eng and found about 300 double entries, especially verbs. Two years ago I removed all double entries (lemma + PoS with different pardef if one is unnecessary or wrong) from apertium-eng.
Some of the double entries are like this: <e lm="remarry"> <i>remarr</i><par n="appl/y__vblex"/></e> <e lm="remarry"> <i>remarry</i><par n="accept__vblex"/></e> (the second new one ist wrong because pp is remarried and not remarryed, as fare as I know) <e lm="swell"> <i>sw</i><par n="sw/ell__vblex"/></e> <e lm="swell"> <i>swel</i><par n="spel/l__vblex"/></e> (the second new one, in my dictionary I didn't find swelt as pp of swell? only swelled and swollen) I can remove all the double entries again but unfortunately apertium-eng now belongs to a released language pair. What's the best way now to remove these double entries and how can we ensure that no one will add these again in future, because he uses this entry in his (unreleaded) language pair? In the next days I will try to remove a few of the wrong ones so we can watch what happend. I think if we can find the source we have the possibility to correct this directly in the source dictionary so that this will not copied again to apertium-eng. Best regards, wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
