Tino Didriksen <tino.didrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To allow for Techievena's weights, a new breaking binary format was needed
> for lttoolbox. I've now implemented something that should be fairly
> future-proof - if we're going to break it, might as well break it in a way
> that won't bite us later.
> [...]
> This means we can add features, fluff, and versioning to the binary format
> later with less pain.
> 
> Anyone got any bikeshedding for the format break?

Seems perfect, actually what I intended HFST format to be like as well
but we didn't quite get there. 

-- 
Doktor Tommi A Pirinen, Computational Linguist,
<https://flammie.github.io/purplemonkeydishwasher/>, Universität
Hamburg, Hamburger Zentrum für Sprachkorpora <http://hzsk.de>. CLARIN-D
Entwickler.  President of ACL SIGUR SIG for Uralic languages
<http://gtweb.uit.no/sigur/>.
I tend to follow inline-posting style in desktop e-mail messages.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to