Hi Jonathan, You are right, the main goal is that people with only linguistic knowledge can contribute in a more facilitated way. I believe there are many people who want to contribute and end up not having that possibility. This interface would allow multiple users to add words in a more practical way and all dictionaries could benefit. However, I am aware that there must be a flow for approving the modifications, and the responsible for each dictionary should accept it.
Best regards, Vinicius Nogueira Em dom, 28 de abr de 2019 às 14:36, Jonathan Washington < jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi Vinicius, > > This is impressive, especially the level of integration with git. > > The main problem is that the purpose of a web dictionary editor is for > people who have linguistic knowledge but not knowledge of git or xml or the > like to contribute linguistic data—and perhaps also for advanced > contributors to have a "quick and easy" way to expand a dictionary. This > interface concept would be too cumbersome for both groups. > > -- > Jonathan > > вс, 28 апр. 2019 г. в 13:15, Vinicius Nogueira < > viniciussnogueir...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Here is an example of use of the Web Dictionary Maintenance prototype >> that is integrated with GitLab: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3UiQGuPHbo >> >> >> Best regards, >> Vinicius Nogueira >> >> Em ter, 16 de abr de 2019 às 09:52, Alessio Miranda Jr, via >> Apertium-stuff <apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu: >> >>> Everyone, all right? >>> >>> I'm with my student Vinicius, who submitted the proposal to GSOC by >>> setting DixTools to create an API that supports the web environment. >>> >>> Web Dictionary Maintenance - Apertium >>> <http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Web_Dictionary_Maintenance> >>> >>> Web Dictionary Maintenance - Apertium >>> >>> <http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Web_Dictionary_Maintenance> >>> >>> >>> >>> Everyone, all right? >>> >>> I'm with my student Vinicius, who submitted the proposal to GSOC by >>> setting DixTools to create an API that supports the web environment. >>> >>> 1) DixTools has several years that is not updated, it is still an active >>> project or has been replaced. Is it interesting to use it as part of the >>> solution? >>> >>> 2) There was a change from the repository to GitHub, which has >>> reasonable differences to the old SVN. In the proposal is being mentioned >>> GitLab that has more management tools than GitHub. It is not a substitution. >>> >>> 3) In the current proposal the Api BackEnd will be done with Java / >>> SpringBoot and XML and Postgres and the FrontEnd with Angular. Are there >>> any objections about these technologies? >>> >>> 4) An interesting part is that part of the functionality of the "Python >>> API / library for Apertium" idea can be contemplated in this project. The >>> only thing is that the API would be done in Java, but I do not know if this >>> is a problem. >>> >>> 5) Some mentor is interested in talking directly on the subject, I >>> become available to be a local mentor of Vinicius in Brazil. >>> >>> Thanks >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Apertium-stuff mailing list >>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
