Hi Jonathan, Sure apertium-por-cat is a continuation of the old apertium-pt-ca. There is a vast amount of fine work in apertium-pt-ca and it can be found in apertium-por-cat. But I did not create apertium-por-cat. I found it. It seems it was created by the user nuboro in January 2016, maybe with the help of Fran, who also has a commit then ( https://github.com/apertium/apertium-por-cat/commits/master?after=e918d92eef977808f5542db47c549e27832aa0ed+209 ). I think that the problem is "only" with the history of apertium-pt-ca in GitHub if it is removed. By the way, the AUTHORS file in apertium-por-cat was empty, which seemed strange to me. I see now that that AUTHORS file in apertium-pt-ca has a number of lines, so I am surprised why this particular file in apertium-pot-cat was not copied from apertium-pt-ca. So I'll add now the old AUTHORS information to the new package.
Hèctor Missatge de Jonathan Washington <jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> del dia dj., 29 d’ag. 2019 a les 5:59: > Hi Hèctor, > > Do I understand that apertium-por-cat is not a continuation of the code > from apertium-pt-ca? > > I would have expected that the code is a continuation (or branch) of the > old repo. If this were the case, pushing the new code to the > apertium-pt-ca repo and renaming it to apertium-por-cat would be the ideal > approach. > > If instead we're dealing with two separate and unrelated code bases (what > it sounds like), then we need to figure out a way to keep the old code > around but make sure people don't try to use it for anything unless they > know that it's been superseded. A two-repo solution is not ideal in this > case... > > -- > Jonathan > > ср, 28 авг. 2019 г. в 08:55, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer <unham...@fsfe.org>: > >> Hèctor Alòs i Font <hectoralos-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> >> čálii: >> >> > Thanks, Kevin! >> > About the other question, I have no idea, but the case of apertium-ca-it >> > (which has to be substitued by apertium-cat-ita) is the same. I cannot >> > understand has has been done with it: >> > https://github.com/search?q=apertium-ca-it >> >> It seems that ca-it has been *renamed* cat-ita, so now >> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-ca-it redirects to >> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cat-ita >> >> > By the way, apertium-por-cat should probably be labeled as trunk. >> >> done :) >> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
