El 2020-08-27 09:54, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer escribió:
Tanmai Khanna <khanna.tan...@gmail.com>
čálii:
Hmm, well then I guess for now the small list of tags that still exist
as
blanks have to be printed using the <b pos="1"/> option. I could
change it
so that it flushes all blanks, or keeps them in their position if
possible.
The good thing is that these aren't wordbound semantically so them not
being in their "correct" position won't cause a lot of issues.
This can be discussed: Do we want control over where to print these
tags if
they exist in the stream (not wordbound tags or block tags), or do we
want
that they flush out anyway and the user shouldn't worry about the
blanks.
I would prefer that the user doesn't have to worry about the blanks (or
the b pos attribute). I can't imagine a use-case where it would matter
since we don't actually look at the contents, when we write <b…/> in
a rule we just want there to be some space between the words.
Ideally the blanks would be printed as close as possible to where they
were, but if these are rare (and don't belong on words and don't have
anything to do with structure) maybe it's not so important, as long as
they get printed before/after the rule output.
Agree, blank handling should not really be handled in transfer, putting
<b/>
is ok, but we shouldn't be controlling it with the pos="" option.
Fran
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
