Tested against v1.2.1 of apertium-spa, runinng some translations in both pairs, and it seems working pretty well.
Ideally, we'd need to do a testvoc, but I'm not sure it's worth: what we have now in master is probably better than whatever was last published. Missatge de Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> del dia dt., 30 de març 2021 a les 19:11: > Oh, that's true. > > Should we just copy it locally to that pair as a stop gap? > > Or just point it to *any* spa version (including latest) should work.... > I can run some tests locally, I'll give it a try against v1.2.1 and I'll > report back. > > Missatge de Daniel Swanson <awesomeevildu...@gmail.com> del dia dt., 30 > de març 2021 a les 19:06: > >> -es-gl has its own dictionaries, but depends on -spa's .rlx file. >> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:59 AM Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Missatge de Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> del dia dl., 29 de >> març 2021 a les 22:00: >> >> >> >> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/23 is still open, and >> these languages/pairs need someone to sign off on current state or make a >> formal new release. >> >> >> >> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym >> >> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-hin >> >> * https://github.com/giellalt/lang-sme >> >> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-es-gl and must depend on a >> specific release of https://github.com/apertium/apertium-spa >> >> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym-eng and must depend on a >> specific release of https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym and >> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-eng >> >> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-eng-spa >> >> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-sme-nob >> >> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-spa-ita and must depend on a >> specific release of https://github.com/apertium/apertium-spa and >> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-ita >> >> * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-urd-hin and must depend on a >> specific release of https://github.com/apertium/apertium-urd and >> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-hin >> >> >> >> The existing releases cannot build and/or run with current Apertium >> tools. These are holding back Apertium 3.7 from the main site. The >> alternative is that I remove these languages/pairs from the main site. >> >> >> > >> > Hey Tino, >> > >> > I was looking into this, and I'm not sure why apertium-es-gl needs to >> depend on a specific release of spa. As far as I see, this package hasn't >> still moved to use monolingual packages, and has its own Spanish >> dictionaries, tagger, etc. Am I missing something? >> > -- >> > < Xavi Ivars > >> > < http://xavi.ivars.me > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Apertium-stuff mailing list >> > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> > > > -- > < Xavi Ivars > > < http://xavi.ivars.me > > -- < Xavi Ivars > < http://xavi.ivars.me >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
