This is less critical than I thought. I just re-tested all existing packages, and they run. So I can update the main site with existing packages for the ones that can't currently build.
I don't know what changed, because I am quite sure they didn't previously run. But oh well, this is good news. -- Tino Didriksen On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 21:58, Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> wrote: > https://github.com/apertium/organisation/issues/23 is still open, and > these languages/pairs need someone to sign off on current state or make a > formal new release. > > * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym > * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-hin > * https://github.com/giellalt/lang-sme > * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-es-gl and must depend on a > specific release of https://github.com/apertium/apertium-spa > * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym-eng and must depend on a > specific release of https://github.com/apertium/apertium-cym and > https://github.com/apertium/apertium-eng > * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-eng-spa > * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-sme-nob > * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-spa-ita and must depend on a > specific release of https://github.com/apertium/apertium-spa and > https://github.com/apertium/apertium-ita > * https://github.com/apertium/apertium-urd-hin and must depend on a > specific release of https://github.com/apertium/apertium-urd and > https://github.com/apertium/apertium-hin > > The existing releases cannot build and/or run with current Apertium tools. > These are holding back Apertium 3.7 from the main site. The alternative is > that I remove these languages/pairs from the main site. > > -- Tino Didriksen > >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
