Dear Masato, Pranesh and everyone,

I know this is very late response for your request for the EC to clarify.  
Apologies.

At Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:41:35 -0700
In message <cf4cc73d.85d7d%[email protected]>
   "Re: [apnic-talk] IANA Globalization Progress"
   "Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]>" wrote:

| Pranesh and All,
| 
| While I'm not new to APNIC, I have same question/concern.
| Can EC clarify it?
| 

Montevideo Statement was crafted among the I* CEOs in the situation, as Tony 
has already told, with very limited time allowance with very quick moves at 
that time, and so was the I*'s reaction to NTIA statement.

Technically speaking on the basis of our governing provisions, the Executive 
Council has function to act on behalf of the Members in the interval between 
AGMs, and to manage the activities, functions and affairs of APNIC.

More practically, the EC represents the Membership to manage APNIC's activity, 
and need to comply the will of the Membership, sometimes with the broader 
community.  

We have the power to authorise the activity by DG and Secretariat for the 
Membership, but need to synchronise our thought on the authorization with the 
Membership.

That is why we set a timeslot to discuss the Internet Governance issue in the 
AMM this time, after we announced our support for Montevideo Statement in 
January.

It was great to see very active discussion there, and that it triggered the 
continued discussion on line.


As Masato points out, now Paul is more engaged in the activity of coordination 
among our fellow organizations and ITU arena, which is based on the EC's 
authorization.  We authorize becuase we think it needed.

I understand it looks like politics game with little thing, if not nothing, to 
do with Members' own business.

However from the viewpoint of a company whose business is serving community 
with Internet Resource, one of which is APNIC, it is really important to 
address the risk of unwanted non-viable arrangement and to have people with 
other stakes understand our position.

Moreover, as already mentioned, the forthcoming couple of years are quite 
crucial stage for us to keep our healthy business environment.

That's why we authorize these activities by Secretariat, and what we need to 
have you understand.

As we have many things to come, Director General and the EC will have more 
communication each other to consider these actions, than we have already been 
doing.



I know, through my own business, that how Internet Governance issues are 
difficult for people (e.g. of tech community) to realize,  I am still on the 
way to find how I can couple the issue we confront adequately with community's 
interest.

The EC needs to have the Membership's support with well-informed consent, and 
of course we need to change our thought just in case we found it was not of the 
Membership and community, and I hope the current discussion will valuable for 
the purpose.


Sincerely,

MAEMURA Akinori, my own hat on, but I am sure the EC well sheres these points



| Rgs,
| Masato Yamanishi
| 
| 
| 
| On 14/03/14 23:01, "Pranesh Prakash" <[email protected]> wrote:
| 
| >Tony Smith [2014-03-14 21:42]:
| >> As I'm sure you appreciate, the news from the US has just arrived this
| >>morning and a lot of the details are still coming to light. We're
| >>planning to prepare something that explains what this development means
| >>in more detail when more information is confirmed.
| >
| >I'm sorry, but I'm new to APNIC's lists.
| >
| >Was there any consultation within APNIC before APNIC's leader's name was
| >added to this statement?  Could you also point me towards the community
| >consultation / mailing list discussions that took place before the
| >Montevideo Declaration was signed as something APNIC endorsed?
| >
| >> But for now, we wanted to alert everyone to this news and the fact
| >>consultation will begin in our region in Singapore.
| >
| >Could you outline the intra-APNIC consultations (i.e., not the ICANN
| >consultations about which ICANN's published a document) that will take
| >place with regard to this?  Which mailing list will these discussions be
| >directed towards?
| >
| >-- 
| >Pranesh Prakash
| >Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society
| >T: +91 80 40926283 | W: http://cis-india.org
| >-------------------
| >Access to Knowledge Fellow, Information Society Project, Yale Law School
| >M: +1 520 314 7147 | W: http://yaleisp.org
| >PGP ID: 0x1D5C5F07 | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pranesh_prakash
| >
| 
| 
| _______________________________________________
| apnic-talk mailing list
| [email protected]
| http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
| 
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk

Reply via email to