Masato,
(2014/03/21 11:18), Masato Yamanishi wrote: > Maemura-san and EC members, > > Thank you for sharing EC's view. > Let me quote your statement in slightly different order to make my comment. > >> Technically speaking on the basis of our governing provisions, >> the Executive Council has function to act on behalf of the Members >> in the interval between AGMs, and to manage the activities, functions >> and affairs of APNIC. >> >> More practically, the EC represents the Membership to manage APNIC's >> activity, >> and need to comply the will of the Membership, sometimes with the >> broader community. >> >> We have the power to authorise the activity by DG and Secretariat for >> the Membership, >> but need to synchronise our thought on the authorization with the >> Membership. >> >> That is why we set a timeslot to discuss the Internet Governance issue >> in the AMM this time, >> after we announced our support for Montevideo Statement in January. > > It complies with APNIC by-laws 30, so I don't see any problem from > procedure perspective. Yes, as you see the wording in my message was in accordance with it. > BUT, > >> Montevideo Statement was crafted among the I* CEOs in the situation, as >> Tony has already told, >> with very limited time allowance with very quick moves at that time, >> and so was the I*'s reaction to NTIA statement. > > > Do you mean that DG had signed it before consulting EC nor members as > there was not enough time? > Does it comply with APNIC by-laws 54? It says; I am sure he has been in full touch with the EC to proceed these issues and signed them under the EC's authorization. Akinori > 54. The main functions of the Director General are: > a. to act as the chief executive officer of APNIC and the corporation; > b. to have, subject to the provisions of these by-laws and to the > direction of the Executive Council, the responsibility for the general > management and control of the activities, functions and affairs of APNIC > and the corporation and shall perform all duties and have all powers which > are commonly incident to the office of chief executive or which are > delegated by the Executive Council; > c. to execute all contracts, agreements and other instruments of the > corporation which are authorised including affixing the Seal of the > corporation; > d. to appoint and have general supervision and direction of all of the > other staff and agents of APNIC and the corporation, including but not > limited to bookkeeping, accounting and treasury functions on behalf of the > Treasurer; > e. to implement strategic policies, prepare plans for APNIC, and shall > coordinate its activities, functions and affairs; > f. to report to the Executive Council and to put forward resolutions for > the consideration of the Executive Council; > g. to take all the actions required to ensure the economic use of > APNIC's resources and shall be responsible to the Executive Council for > all the administrative and financial aspects of APNIC's activities; > h. to act as the legal representative of APNIC and the corporation; > i. to act as an ex-officio member of the Executive Council. > > > Rgs, > Masato Yamanishi > > > On 14/03/19 0:12, "MAEMURA Akinori" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Masato, Pranesh and everyone, >> >> I know this is very late response for your request for the EC to clarify. >> Apologies. >> >> At Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:41:35 -0700 >> In message <cf4cc73d.85d7d%[email protected]> >> "Re: [apnic-talk] IANA Globalization Progress" >> "Masato Yamanishi <[email protected]>" wrote: >> >> | Pranesh and All, >> | >> | While I'm not new to APNIC, I have same question/concern. >> | Can EC clarify it? >> | >> >> Montevideo Statement was crafted among the I* CEOs in the situation, as >> Tony has already told, with very limited time allowance with very quick >> moves at that time, and so was the I*'s reaction to NTIA statement. >> >> Technically speaking on the basis of our governing provisions, the >> Executive Council has function to act on behalf of the Members in the >> interval between AGMs, and to manage the activities, functions and >> affairs of APNIC. >> >> More practically, the EC represents the Membership to manage APNIC's >> activity, and need to comply the will of the Membership, sometimes with >> the broader community. >> >> We have the power to authorise the activity by DG and Secretariat for the >> Membership, but need to synchronise our thought on the authorization with >> the Membership. >> >> That is why we set a timeslot to discuss the Internet Governance issue in >> the AMM this time, after we announced our support for Montevideo >> Statement in January. >> >> It was great to see very active discussion there, and that it triggered >> the continued discussion on line. >> >> >> As Masato points out, now Paul is more engaged in the activity of >> coordination among our fellow organizations and ITU arena, which is based >> on the EC's authorization. We authorize becuase we think it needed. >> >> I understand it looks like politics game with little thing, if not >> nothing, to do with Members' own business. >> >> However from the viewpoint of a company whose business is serving >> community with Internet Resource, one of which is APNIC, it is really >> important to address the risk of unwanted non-viable arrangement and to >> have people with other stakes understand our position. >> >> Moreover, as already mentioned, the forthcoming couple of years are quite >> crucial stage for us to keep our healthy business environment. >> >> That's why we authorize these activities by Secretariat, and what we need >> to have you understand. >> >> As we have many things to come, Director General and the EC will have >> more communication each other to consider these actions, than we have >> already been doing. >> >> >> >> I know, through my own business, that how Internet Governance issues are >> difficult for people (e.g. of tech community) to realize, I am still on >> the way to find how I can couple the issue we confront adequately with >> community's interest. >> >> The EC needs to have the Membership's support with well-informed consent, >> and of course we need to change our thought just in case we found it was >> not of the Membership and community, and I hope the current discussion >> will valuable for the purpose. >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> MAEMURA Akinori, my own hat on, but I am sure the EC well sheres these >> points >> >> >> >> | Rgs, >> | Masato Yamanishi >> | >> | >> | >> | On 14/03/14 23:01, "Pranesh Prakash" <[email protected]> wrote: >> | >> | >Tony Smith [2014-03-14 21:42]: >> | >> As I'm sure you appreciate, the news from the US has just arrived >> this >> | >>morning and a lot of the details are still coming to light. We're >> | >>planning to prepare something that explains what this development >> means >> | >>in more detail when more information is confirmed. >> | > >> | >I'm sorry, but I'm new to APNIC's lists. >> | > >> | >Was there any consultation within APNIC before APNIC's leader's name >> was >> | >added to this statement? Could you also point me towards the community >> | >consultation / mailing list discussions that took place before the >> | >Montevideo Declaration was signed as something APNIC endorsed? >> | > >> | >> But for now, we wanted to alert everyone to this news and the fact >> | >>consultation will begin in our region in Singapore. >> | > >> | >Could you outline the intra-APNIC consultations (i.e., not the ICANN >> | >consultations about which ICANN's published a document) that will take >> | >place with regard to this? Which mailing list will these discussions >> be >> | >directed towards? >> | > >> | >-- >> | >Pranesh Prakash >> | >Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society >> | >T: +91 80 40926283 | W: http://cis-india.org >> | >------------------- >> | >Access to Knowledge Fellow, Information Society Project, Yale Law >> School >> | >M: +1 520 314 7147 | W: http://yaleisp.org >> | >PGP ID: 0x1D5C5F07 | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pranesh_prakash >> | > >> | >> | >> | _______________________________________________ >> | apnic-talk mailing list >> | [email protected] >> | http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk >> | > _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
