Thank you for confirming. The display issue is at my end, will solve it without difficulty.
Thank you. On Fri, May 15, 2020, 05:24 Sofia Silva Berenguer <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the heads-up Sivasubramanian! > > I'm sorry I cannot help you further as I cannot reproduce your issue. I do > see more than 5,000 rows in the file you attached. > > Warm regards, > Sofía > > On 13/5/20, 5:17 pm, "sivasubramanian muthusamy" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dear Sofia, > > > Replied as below, with an attachment, but the attachment did not go > through. Must have reached your personal mail box. In any case please see > below. It is most likely that it is NOT your mistake. > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:25 AM sivasubramanian muthusamy < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear Sofia, > > > If it is working for you, the limitations I have experienced were > because of the steps I had to follow in opening the file. I was on India > specific view, though the URL didn't say India ( > https://stats.apnic.net/holders/Southern%20Asia/IN ), > the file did not open in my Android phone, downloaded it on a Chrome > Book from that India specific page with the page title "Summary Holder > Information for India", the file downloaded with the name > "summary_holder-info-for-southern asia" without the filetype > in the file name, I renamed it summary_holder-info-for-southern > asia.csv, opened it with Google Sheets, which shows 132755 in Column Q as > the last entry. The file as I downloaded and renamed is attached, I > downloaded it once again now, followed the same process > by giving the file extension .xls, Google Docs still shows the 5000th > row as the last row, so this must be a limitation on the cloud. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:26 AM Sofia Silva Berenguer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Dear Sivasubramanian, > > My name is Sofía. I'm the Product Manager for the Internet Directory. > > There is no max limit for the number of entries in the spreadsheet. If > you are interested in the Holders list for IPv4 resources in India, I would > recommend selecting India in the left side menu (either by clicking on > India in the hierarchical menu or by entering > India in the search field) and then selecting the IPv4 tab in the > grey area on the top of the screen. This will show a table with 416 pages. > I have just downloaded it and I got 6,233 rows in the spreadsheet. I do see > Bharti Airtel in the spreadsheet, so I'm > wondering whether you had some other filter applied to the Holders > table you were visualizing? > > > I hope this helps. > > Warm regards, > Sofía > > On 13/5/20, 11:59 am, "[email protected] on behalf > of sivasubramanian muthusamy" <[email protected] > on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Tony Smith, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:07 AM Tony Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Sivasubramanian, > > Logging in with an APNIC Login to the Internet Directory link will > allow you to see the Holders view which offers a table with more > information about entities that hold space in an economy and what space > they hold. An APNIC login is free and easy to set > up. > > > https://beta-login.apnic.net/auth/realms/apnic/login-actions/registration?client_id=internet-directory&tab_id=Za5Rf2MDDr0 > < > https://beta-login.apnic.net/auth/realms/apnic/login-actions/registration?client_id=internet-directory&tab_id=Za5Rf2MDDr0 > > > > However APNIC does not have data about how the IP addresses are > used, especially in terms of NAT and dynamic addresses. > > > > > > > Thank you :) It worked. APNIC maintains good transparency. > Downloaded a holder's view spread sheet with 5000 entries (Spreadsheet max > limit ?) with 5000 entries, of which I could see none that said Airtel or > Bharti Airtel, which is strange, and of the > remaining out of the 5000 entries in this possibly truncated > sheet, 3707 entries were that of NIXI, mostly /22s, less than a hundred or > so entries showed Jio, about a hundred for Tatas, and others were mostly > business enterprises, about seventy or eighty > of > them. As the table showed a combined view of v4, v6 and ASNs, > and showed /24 - 16s all in one column, there is no way of totalling the > allocation, especially due to the possibility that this is truncated data. > And, as you have observed, there is no indication > of how the IP addresses were reassigned and to how many different > networks / nodes (the total number of unique networks with static IP > addresses in India). Probably the same level of data in all RIRs. > > > > I got into some detail here, but the purpose is not to focus on a > few ISPs / Exchanges, but rather to see if there is a general tendency > (everywhere) to retain IP addresses by the holders within their network > rather than to reallot a fair number of the > addresses. > > > Thank you. > > > > Thanks > Tony > > > From: sivasubramanian muthusamy <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, 12 May 2020 at 4:41 pm > To: Tony Smith <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Fwd: Apnic fees for IPv4 / v6 > > Thank you. The link pointed me to the information I was looking > for, and I could get to the spreadsheet attached. But the data does not > contain any information about what happens after the IPv4 addresses are > assigned by APNIC (or other RIRs). Is there any > data > available, or some form of assessment about how many unique / > static assignees are in India, and what portion of these allocations are > retained by the large networks and used by NAT and other means as dynamic > addresses? > > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/sivasubramanianmuthusamy/ < > https://www.linkedin.com/in/sivasubramanianmuthusamy/> > mailto:[email protected] > http://twitter.com/shivaindia > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:47 AM Tony Smith <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi Sivasubramanian, > > You may find the delegation statistics available here useful. > There’s several data visualisation tools and the data is downloadable: > > > > https://directory.apnic.net/delegations/Southern < > https://directory.apnic.net/delegations/Southern> < > https://directory.apnic.net/delegations/Southern> Asia/IN > > Thanks > Tony > > > > From: <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of > sivasubramanian muthusamy <mailto:[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, 12 May 2020 at 4:09 pm > To: "mailto:[email protected]"; <mailto: > [email protected]> > Subject: [apnic-talk] Fwd: Apnic fees for IPv4 / v6 > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: sivasubramanian muthusamy <mailto:[email protected]> > Date: Thu, May 7, 2020, 19:25 > Subject: Apnic fees for IPv4 / v6 > To: <mailto:[email protected]> > > Is there any published data on the total size of IP addresses > allotted, for instance, to networks in India and the number of 'unique > assignees' in India? > > > > Thank you. > > Sivasubramanian M > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
