Dear Ronald, we’ll take a look at this and report back. Thanks for the notice.
Paul. ________________________________________________________________________ Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC [email protected] http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg On 31 Jul 2021, at 18:03, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > APNIC Hostmaster, > > The following two IP address blocks are reserved as per RFC 5737, > Section 3: > > 198.51.100.0/24 > 203.0.113.0/24 > > As per RFC 5737, Section 3, these two blocks do not belong to any > specific or particular Regional Internet Registry, nor should they > be assigned to any individual or particular resource member of any > particular RIR. Both blocks are effectively reserved by IANA, based > on RFC 5737, and that fact is reflected in the NRO's daily stats file, > where these blocks are quite clearly assigned to and associated with > IANA: > > iana|ZZ|ipv4|198.51.100.0|256|20090714|reserved|ietf|iana > iana|ZZ|ipv4|203.0.113.0|256|20090714|reserved|ietf|iana > > Nontheless, these two blocks are also incorrectly mentioned in APNIC's own > daily stats file, where they are incorrectly represented as allocations > under the administration of APNIC: > > apnic||ipv4|198.51.100.0|256||reserved| > apnic||ipv4|203.0.113.0|256||reserved| > > Please remove all references to these two RFC-reserved IPv4 address blocks > from both the APNIC WHOIS data base and also from the APNIC daily stats > file. All such mentions of either block in APNIC-specific data bases or > data files are invalid and are in direct conflict with NRO/IANA supplied > information as noted above. > > > Regards, > rfg > > _______________________________________________ > apnic-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
