Okoli,

As you appear to only be a copywriter for the NRS and don’t really specialise 
in this area (and due to your failure to acknowledge or respond to my previous 
replies), I’ll address your points for those who follow the chain.

APNIC holds two member meetings, one in September (at the standalone APNIC 
conference) and the second in late February (at the APNIC conference track to 
APRICOT). APNIC’s financial and annual reports run from 01 January to 31 
December therefore it takes them some time to create these reports, compile the 
data and present the report before the Member Meeting in February each year. If 
you read the financial report, it was only signed-off on 26 February, being 
yesterday.

If they aimed to get the reports out (as an example) 4 weeks prior to the 
elections this would not leave them enough time to prepare the report. It could 
very well take Ernst & Young (the independent auditors) a month to compile 
their report.

Therefore, they aim to get their reports out with enough time for them to be 
reviewed so members can ask questions, if any. APNIC do a damn excellent job to 
get the reports out in the time that they do. To allege that they are 
intentionally holding these reports to favour certain individuals for 
re-election is just downright wrong in every definition.

Further, if you’re only paid to write articles, why would you care about 
APNIC’s governance (as these emails appear to be written in your first-person 
view)? Unless you’re being paid to write these emails (which I wouldn’t fault 
you for personally seeing as it’s your job) based on the views of others, but 
that then begs the question - why wouldn’t those directing you to write the 
emails the way you are simply post it themselves?

Your line of emails simply appears to intend to cast unjustified doubt on these 
elections, which is quite common for the NRS in the lead-up to elections and 
using yourself as a puppet to push their agenda. To call them out for 
intentionally withholding the reports then congratulating them is nothing short 
of patronising.

Regards,
Christopher Hawker
_______________________________________________
APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to