On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote: > So we have a binary (C based) version of aa-exec that just needs a little > more revision before we land it. One of the things we need to decide is > which package to put it in. > > We could modify the utils packaging to handle binary and no arch, create > a new package for binary utils, or just move it into the apparmor_parser > packaging, and make it part of the default install. > > What are peoples preferences for this
It's tiny and adds no new dependencies: parser packge feels fair. Thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
