On 07/25/2013 03:57 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On 07/24/2013 05:29 PM, John Johansen wrote: >> On 07/24/2013 02:35 PM, Steve Beattie wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote: > >>> directory becoming more of an architecture dependent collection of >>> binaries. But it's not a strongly held position. >>> >> I actually don't want the parser dir to be a dumping ground. I'd rather >> move in the direction of moving the init scripts out of there and >> having packages put them into the parser package or their own package. >> > To be clear, you don't mind aa-exec moving there for now, you just don't want > every future compiled binary to move there. Correct? I agree with that. > > To be clear I'd rather it didn't, and I'd like to pull the none parser bits that already live there out as well.
With that said I could like with it there, though I don't see it being much more work to just create a binary-utils directory, and avoid creating more work (that will never get done) for ourselves in the future. -- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
