El Lunes, 29 de Mayo de 2006 16:17, Benjamin Meyer escribió:
> On Monday 29 May 2006 15:59, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 May 2006 21:57, Iñaki wrote:
> > > The first one is the mockup I did.
> > > The tabs are below the navigation toolbar and above the specific
> > > toolbar: http://konqueror4.linuxdevel.net
> >
> > You know what sucks with your repeated pitching of that mockup,
> > Iñaki??
> >
> > --> The fact that you don't hint to the fact that it is "animated"
> >     and that clicking on certain elements "works".    ;-)   ;-P
>
> Taking a look, can anyone find a justification for the left sidebar?
>


> Starting from the bottom with "Workplaces" it just look like a bunch of
> bookmarks or fast links.  Really it is just redundant of what is already in
> the first and third tab.

It's obvious that you haven't read the explanation document. Read it first, 
please:
  http://konqueror4-explain.linuxdevel.net



> The second to the bottom is Bookmarks which seems 
> to be the web browser bookmarks.  Would they just open the webbrowser? 
> Isn't it kind of confusing for them to be there?  Why would you even want
> your web browser bookmarks to show up here?  If they are file system
> bookmarks they they are again redundant with what is already in the local
> tab ("fast links" section).

Please, read before criticize.



> Yes you "can" browse the web using your file 
> manager, but the experience is kind of crappy, and a list view is a
> horrible way to interact with your bookmarks.

Please, see the specific toolbar in web browser mode: there is a 
classic "Bookmarks" button.



> I mean how many people do 
> you know that have less then 20 bookmarks?  File management and web
> browsing are two different beasts.

Not in my opinion. But it's just my opinion. Konqueror can now manage files, 
documents and web, why eliminate it?



> Moving on the second tab is "Remote", I 
> assume this is remotely mounted filesystems.

Yes. 


> As a user why do I care if 
> they are local or remote?

The users understand the different between "local" and "remote". If there are 
many computers in an office and one of them has a shared resource the users 
know that that is a REMOTE resource, not local one. And they understand that 
they don't have to look for it between the pendrive and CD (IMHO).


> They really belong in the "local" tab with the 
> rest of the devices.

Local? really?




I hope you read the entire explanation before criticize next time.



-- 
Iñaki
_______________________________________________
Appeal mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/appeal

Reply via email to