Regarding concerns with GMO's, transgenic technology, and lack of real evidence 
of environmental problems. Offhand I know of at least one incidence - Bt 
Cotton, inserting Bt bacterial genes into cotton (patented by Monsanto as 
Bollgard cotton).

Bt cottonseed, genetically modified to produce its own insecticide, was 
introduced in India in 2002. Between 2003 and 2005, the market share of Bt seed 
created through collaboration between US based Monsanto Co. and several Indian 
companies rose to 62 percent from 12 percent = $$$$. India emerged as the 
dominant supplier of cotton yarn in the world.  

There is a problem though. The farmers in India are spreading the Bt cotton 
genetics to other varieties of cotton, perhaps from not understanding this new 
technology and also from continuing their traditional cultivation practices.  
So Monsanto is upset with the farmers not respecting its genetic patents.

In 2006 Monsanto's monopoly over Bt cotton technology in India ended when two 
new players - the Hyderabad-based JK Agri-Genetics Ltd and Nath Seeds Ltd of 
Aurangabad, launched Bt cotton hybrids based on alternate technologies. So now 
there are more companies producing and patenting genetically modified cotton 
seeds.

Roll back ten years in the US where cotton growers were using Bollgard and 
expecting a 95% effective control against the Boll Weevil as promoted by 
Monsanto. Instead they only got a 60 - 65% control on the weevils. The strength 
of Bt in the GM plant tissue was insufficient to kill all the beetles. Nearly 
40% munched on the GMO crop and lived to reproduce their tough genetics. 
Michael Hansen, a research associate with the Consumer Policy Institute, 
described the situation as being "the quickest way to produce resistance. It 
couldn't have been designed any better to do away with this important tool."  
The US farmers went to court for false advertising, saying that the cotton 
wasn't living up to its promoted resistance and they were having to supplement 
with additional insecticide sprays.  This didn't stop Monsanto from moving its 
product to India.

Last year in India we learned that the Bt cotton is no longer living up to 
expectations there as well. I wonder why?  The farmers there are also suing for 
the same reason.  

So, in the end what has been the overall result?  A new super strain of cotton 
insect pests in two countries that are even harder to control than ever before.

Daryl Hunter
Keswick Ridge
NB Canada







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philip Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Apple-Crop" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Apple-Crop: Time article (More on same)


Arthur,

I think you have raised a central point in this debate.  You are relying 
heavily on intuition and your own views.  I'm sure that you are a smart guy 
and that your intuition is generally good, but the implication is that you 
distrust science and that you will make your choices based on what seems 
right to you.  Were we all to adopt that approach, things would probably be 
chaotic and learning and understanding would not progress very well.  When 
it came to making rules, who's opinion would we rely upon.  I've often 
stated that I'm a huge fan of cooperative extension and the reason is that 
they provide guidance based on the best scientific understanding currently 
available.  Yes, science is wrong sometimes, but that's not a reason to 
distrust it.  I can think of no better way of deciding what is true or not 
than to test it scientifically even if we err on occasion..

The fact that some things smell bad is scientifically sound.  Your brain is 
telling you to avoid eating them.  Poop for example.  As for your contention 
that organic foods taste better, I would think that it might be difficult to 
substantiate that based soley on the means of cultivation.  And is it 
healthier?  That remains a matter of opinion, doesn't it?

Messing with the natural genetic order of things may be risky, but so is 
space exploration.  One of the wonderful aspects of human beings is their 
inquisitive nature and desire to explore.  Whether it's space, GMO's or stem 
cells, we can't stop learning.  We may have difficulty deciding what to do 
with what we've learned, but we can't stop exploring.  I wish organics would 
take that same approach.  Right now it seems that much of discussion is 
based purely on what one chooses to believe.

Philip Smith

Reply via email to