Sorry, I got this email chain on my cell phone, and thought it was from a 
different mailing list. (One for amateur fruit growers, and one that is much 
more prone to getting scares about various chemicals.)

Ginda Fisher
apple consumer


On Apr 28, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Ginda Fisher wrote:

> Can anyone summarize what this chemical is, why and how it is used, and what 
> the risks might be to farmers and consumers from its use? I feel like I 
> walked into the middle of a conversation.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Typed with Swype. Who knows what I meant to say?
> 
> On April 28, 2014 4:03:51 AM EDT, "Con.Traas" <con.tr...@ul.ie> wrote:
> Hello Evan and everybody,
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Coming from my perspective, where we are now having to cope without DPA for 
> storing Bramley (culinary) apples, I must say that is it proving tricky, but 
> we are managing, through use of 1-MCP combined with more complex (and 
> expensive and risky) storage regimes. So I would say it is technically 
> possible to keep apples without DPA or ethoxyquin, which we also can’t use, 
> but ironically it mitigates against the smaller grower, and in favour of the 
> larger ones (big ag?) who can afford the higher tech gear.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> It is ironic that scaring people about pesticide residues on fresh foods 
> (especially fruits) actually causes people to eat more processed foods (as 
> though their ingredients do not also get pesticide treatments), as the 
> studies linking better health with fruit consumption are studies conducted 
> with conventionally grown fruits with their pesticide residues (if they are 
> not residue free). In other words, the benefits of eating fruits and 
> vegetables are there in black and white, even if those fruits and vegetables 
> have residues. It is far less healthy to switch to a candy bar from an apple, 
> even if that apple has some residue (so long as that is below permitted 
> levels). However, this is not a message we can send out, so we are left 
> grappling when emails like this from EWG are circulated.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> The joke of what EWG seems to be doing is producing a dirty dozen or clean 
> fifteen list is that those lists say nothing at all about the risk of a 
> pesticide residue on the particular apple in your fruit-bowl. You could be 
> eating a residue-free fruit from among the “dirty dozen”, or one covered in 
> pesticide from among the “clean fifteen”.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Despite the differences in regulations between Europe and the US (and I 
> favour in general the less permissive, more cautious European standards, 
> despite having to work within their restrictions), our agriculture here is 
> constantly increasing in scale, and resembles more and more what would be our 
> stereotyped image of US industrial agriculture. That is because the 
> regulations have more in common than what separates them, and farming is 
> becoming more and more like a business, and less like a passion.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> I am personally not a fan of industrial agriculture, although I employ mostly 
> similar methods. However, motivation is a key factor, and for me, the 
> motivation is not profit maximisation. For the industrial model is about 
> profit before all else, and that is not a suitable way for the World to 
> produce its food.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> However, as long as Joe public takes the attitude that 7% of their disposable 
> income is what they will spend on food (that is the Irish %), then 
> agriculture will continue to become more industrial, as for me that is not a 
> percentage that can support the production of produce and foods that 
> consumers might feel more comfortable buying, and might be able to have more 
> confidence in.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> So, instead of sending 45 bucks to Ken Cook, I would suggest that Joe public 
> either sends it to a principled (and hopefully small-scale) farmer someplace 
> near them, or better still, buys a few fruit trees or invests in a few 
> packets of seeds, and grows their own pesticide-free produce.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Con Traas
> 
> 
> European (Irish) Apple Grower
> 
> 
> T: @theapplefarmer
> 
> 
>  
> 
> From: apple-crop-boun...@virtualorchard.net 
> [mailto:apple-crop-boun...@virtualorchard.net] On Behalf Of Evan B. Milburn
> Sent: 28 April 2014 02:32
> To: Apple-Crop
> Subject: Re: [apple-crop] apples and chemicals
> 
> 
>  
>   This was sent to me from a friend of mine by the name of George. It was 
> send to him from one of his co-workers.
> 
> 
>                                                Evan Milburn
> 
> 
>                                         www.milburnorchards.com  
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Hey Evan what’s this all about?
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apple-crop mailing list
> apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
> http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop

_______________________________________________
apple-crop mailing list
apple-crop@virtualorchard.net
http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop

Reply via email to