On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:42:10 -0700, Kris De Schutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luke Crook wrote: >> Have you looked at cl-opengl at all? Those bindings are at least being >> moved >> forward. I haven't done anything on the lispbuilder-opengl bindings >> since I >> started on OpenRM. > > Ah no, I haven't tried it out yet. Does this mean that the > lispbuilder-opengl part is outdated ? To what extent do they differ ? The swig generated bindings of lispbuilder-opengl are a lot closer to the C API. The cl-opengl bindings are more 'Lispy' and have a much richer abstraction layer. I believe that that most people who use lispbuilder-sdl & opengl use cl-opengl. The CFFI and cl-opengl projects also have the same maintainer. Whereas the lispbuilder-sdl bindings are generated using SWIG, cl-opengl has Lisp code to generate low-level bindings from the OpenGL spec files. I'm not sure what the advantage or disadvantage is to using the spec files apart from removing an extra dependency on SWIG when rebuilding the bindings fron scratch. - Luke _______________________________________________ application-builder mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder
