Joe Schaefer wrote: > This time we got lots of help from httpd'ers, who have expressed an > interest in seeing this list absorbed into [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I think that's a good idea, so long as [EMAIL PROTECTED] can withstand the > occasional question about our perl glue.
I would like to express the opposite interest. I subscribe to [email protected] because I'm interested in the development of apreq. I'm *not* interested in the development of httpd as a whole. I definitely would not like to see apreq-dev absorbed into [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would make following the development of apreq far more difficult for me. I have no objection to incorporating the apreq C APIs into httpd or the Perl APIs into mod_perl. I think that's a fine goal and would make apreq available more universally and as easy to install as Apache and mod_perl. Best wishes, Ed
