2012/4/26 Christian PERRIER <[email protected]>: > Quoting Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo ([email protected]): > >> > For finding them again later, some user-tags could be appropriate, >> > too, but only if someone tells it the potential resurrector. >> >> Well, that's only my opinion. I just find it awkward to close bug >> reports affecting different releases just based on the status on the >> most recent one (still in preparation, even if many people --including >> me-- use it directly), when the other releases are going to stay >> active still for a few years. And specially in Debian, where stable >> releases are so fundamental and embedded in the culture. > > IMHO? this is what version tagging is about. > > If the bugs are closed with a version uploaded in unstable, they'll > still be visibnle to users looking at bugs affecting the version of > aptitude-gtk in stable.
So when tools like reportbug make the request "give me the available bugs" it passes a parameter with the current version of the package in the request, and users of stable will still be presented with all of these bug reports? If so I think that it's a good solution, yes. Cheers. _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
