2014-02-03 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]>: > 2014-02-03 Daniel Hartwig <[email protected]>: >> On 3 February 2014 23:58, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 2014-02-03 Daniel Hartwig <[email protected]>: >>>> Duplicates are not desirable, even if it resolves the issue with >>>> missing packages. Anyway, lets just have it reverted and fixed on >>>> wip-cmdline (weeks now, see below). >>> >>> It was a joke, that if one puts the terms twice, having duplicated >>> output might be the intended behaviour. >>> >>> I agree that this the current solution is not good in the case of >>> overlaps (or well, trades one bug for one undesired behaviour or bug, >>> depending on the point of view). >>> >> >> Trading one bug for another obvious bug is unacceptable on master. >> Likewise, with the initial version of "installsizechange" being >> obviously broken in the context of the rest of the module. >> >> You must be more thorough with your work. These kinds of "quick fix" >> are unsuitable for applying to the master branch. >> >>> So I will fix this within a couple of days, no problem. >>> >>> >> >> In the future, please submit your work as patches or prepare changes >> on a separate branch for review. > > > NACK. And I already fixed bugs introduced by yourself in the last > releases and present for many months, so please don't be so cocky. > > I was joking anyway, and the previous bug was present for 4 years, so > living a few days in master is not the end of the world.
With the bug present for 4 years I mean: *almost all* of the sorting policies were broken by the previous, so my investigations and patches already helped to uncover them. Not exactly useless my changes :-) -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
