On 2016-04-05 16:27:38 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > This is basically the same as #762932, but with upgrades to experimental > instead of downgrades, so marking as +wontfix and closing (we already > have the other bug to explain why it's a +wontfix).
Yes, clearly, about this bug, I needed "safety" first, at least to make "The solution that cancels all the user's actions." (cost 20000) better than "Solutions that install packages from non-default versions" (cost 50000). And the first thing concerning downgrades would be to document where they occur. Then, this will be more clear. I've opened a new bug for this documentation issue. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
