On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:38 +0200, Luca MUSCARIELLO wrote: > Then, I feel like FQ is a bad name to call this "newFQ". > It's an implementation of a fair TCP pacer. Which is very useful, but FQ > is kind of misleading, IMHO.
No problem, feel free to send a patch. I am very bad at choosing names. _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
