Dave Taht wrote: > On Sep 25, 2013 9:58 AM, "Eric Dumazet" > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 17:38 +0200, Luca MUSCARIELLO wrote: >> >> > Then, I feel like FQ is a bad name to call this "newFQ". >> > It's an implementation of a fair TCP pacer. Which is very useful, but >> > FQ is kind of misleading, IMHO. >> >> No problem, feel free to send a patch. I am very bad at choosing names. > > Fair TCP pacer = ftp # taken > Paced fair queue = pfq # lit collision > Enhanced paced queue = epq # pronounced epic!
There's also the option of 'Fair Queue Pacing', but I don't think we'd like how 'fqp' would be pronounced :P _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
