On Jul 3, 2014, at 10:22 AM, John Leslie <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be possible for someone to argue that restating a recommendation > from another document weakens both statements; but I disagree: We should > clearly state what we mean in this document, and I believe this wording > does so.
The argument for putting it in there started from the fact that we are obsoleting 2309, as stated in the charter. I would understand a document that updates 2309 to be in a strange state if 2309 is itself made historic or obsolete. So we carried the recommendation into this document so it wouldn’t get lost.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
