On 10/9/2015 11:48 AM, David Lang wrote: >> I.e., there are a lot of things there for a reason. Yes, nothing is >> immutable, but simply claiming "I need it now" and "nobody has >> complained" isn't considered a reasonable way to deploy changes in the >> wild. > > similarly, it's not right to assume that the conditions haven't changed. > > In this case, we have a changed situation. The ACKs are _not_ going to > flow at their 'natural' rate. That assumption has already failed. What > we are discussion is the impact of these changes in the face of this > broken assumption.
Discuss first, deploy later. Joe _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
