Wesley Eddy <w...@mti-systems.com> writes: > IMHO, Standards Track carries more weight to say that there are no > sharp corners, and the IETF is pretty sure this works well. > Experimental is more cautious saying this looks pretty useful, and you > should consider trying it out, but it might have some rough edges > (e.g. like open research questions, identified in several of the AQM > drafts).
Well, for the FQ-CoDel algorithm the caveats are more of the form "fairness queueing in some cases have limitations", not "this particular algorithm has limitations". So if we assume that people know what a fairness queueing algorithm is, I think that FQ-CoDel can most certainly be considered to "work well". I think the fact that it is now on *by default* in a whole range of Linux distributions should attest to that. -Toke _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
