Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-pie-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-pie/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Thanks to the IPR declaring folks for not using the term "standard" in their declaration. (I first looked at one of the earlier ones [1] that did say that, and I was about to start my usual whine when I noticed the most recent one [2] doesn't have that problem:-) [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2123/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2540/ - Seems odd to mention one specific vendor in the security considerations section. Why is that important to include? _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
