You are right, I will remove the specific vendor. Thanks,
Rong > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >COMMENT: >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >- Thanks to the IPR declaring folks for not using the term >"standard" in their declaration. (I first looked at one of >the earlier ones [1] that did say that, and I was about to >start my usual whine when I noticed the most recent one [2] >doesn't have that problem:-) > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2123/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2540/ > >- Seems odd to mention one specific vendor in the security >considerations section. Why is that important to include? > > _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
