Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Has a RFC6390 performance directorate review done for the 2.X metrics? It
should.
See http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/performance-metrics.html
I guess that the metrics will be recorded in the future (See
draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-06
), right? 
For example, Flow Completion Time and Packet Loss Synchronization are
new, I believe.
And some other metrics are already documented in RFC6390 compliant
documents. Pointers should be provided.
See
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-xrblock-independent-burst-gap-discard-01#appendix-A
for an example


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

- Random Early Detection (RED), BLUE, and Proportional Integral
controller (PI)
Would you have references?

- BDP is mentioned a few times. Please expand.

- Glossary section = terminology section, right? If we want to be
consistent across documents

- section 12.2. Why not a MUST below?
   In order to understand an AQM's deployment considerations and
   performance under a specific environment, AQM proposals SHOULD
   describe the parameters that control the macroscopic AQM behavior,
   and identify any parameters that require tuning to operational
   conditions.


_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Reply via email to