On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 18:25:00 -0800 (PST), Howard Schwartz wrote:
> Now that we know there are versions of HIMEM.SYS that take up less
> disk space and/or memory, does anyone have a clue whether the later
> and larger versions of the software actually manage memory better?
> In theory, the extra bytes are not there for nothing, although I
> would not bet on this since we are dealing with Miscrosoft. I would
> love to use an equivalent program that really does the same thing
> but uses less memory.
Howard....get DeaRDOS, any DeaRDOS, except 5.0....it always
works better than MiZerableDOS....
gregy
-- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the
Ultimate Internet Client
