Sergei wrote:
>But also i think that few different Arachne versions for
>different versions of DOS is not good idea.
>Maybe wwwman can check the OS before starting and work with
>different portions of code ? Or this can be done during
>installation.
Actually if compiled under DJGPP it will work in normal DOS as well (just
showing the 8.3 name). But it wastes space (memmory and HD) so there's no
point in doing so. Besides it would require a 386 then as well.
>Lot of folks here work with Windows, and they do not need
>compatibility with 8086 processor.
>It depends from Michael's priorities to do it or not.
Of course. My opinion is (and has been so a long time) that diffrent
versions should exist for XT, AT and 386 (and above). A Linux port will
atleast make it easier to create a 386 (32-bit) DOS version.
//Bernie
http://hem1.passagen.se/bernie/index.htm DOS programs, Star Wars ...
