Hi
Clarence Verge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CV> I was not using virtual screens so that extra delay was not in the
CV> result.
CV> Just doing a page down takes the same time in Arachne as the initial
CV> load - say 5.5 seconds - while Netscape does it in about a third of a
CV> second. That's 18 times faster !
I think this is exactly the problem.
You're not using virt. screens.
If I understan them correctly Virt. screens is simply the layout of the
page. (eg it is rendered one time, and after that the virt. screen is used)
If I'm right, than this means that if they are disabled, than arachne has
to render tha page veverytime you scroll.
CV> - Clarence Verge
CU, Ricsi
--
Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ: 7659421] {RSA-PGP Key avail.}
-=> Criminal: One who gets caught <=-
