L.D. Best wrote:
>
> It made no sense, and it makes even less sense now.
>
> I checked everything, including files & buffers. Files were set to 59
> and buffers to 17. But InSight wouldn't work.
>
> -------
> P:\QEMM\LOADHI /R:1 C:\MOUSE\MOUSE.COM/2 >NUL
> P:\QEMM\LOADHI /R:2 FILES=59 >NUL
Hey LD;
I just noticed the above. What version of QEMM is this ?
>From my post of Feb 21 that no one commented on, I re-post:
---------
We are sometime going to have to examine and deal with the re-direction
inconsistencies. Some DOSs may handle re-directions slightly differently.
On the surface, this looks like it can't be a problem, but re-direction
was designed into DOS before Loadhigh.
So, some DOSs may take LH EPPPD.exe >PPP.log as meaning what we want. i.e.
send the output of EPPPD.exe to PPP.log. Others may want to send the
output of Loadhigh to PPP.log. <g>
Even with gold plated and approved IBM PC-DOS, I find that what gets
re-directed depends on what the program is - without any logical basis
that I can see.
e.g.
BOTH of the lines:
LOADHI BUFFERS>nul=15 or LOADHI BUFFERS=15 >nul
will work with QEMM 4.23
That is, 15 Buffers get loaded high and the babble disappears.
but
NEITHER works with QEMM 5.12 or 8.01 where Loadhi apparantly sends
the buffers to the bit bucket !
-----------
Maybe *I* should try moving that Buffers line around !!
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
