Re: Arachne 1.60 problems (was 1.61)

[Steven Lawson]

> I believe the '486 will still win if there really was a LARGE margin
> before.  Since I found only about a 20% diffference in speed, there
> must be some other factor at work here. (IMHO)

1.6x should be *alot* faster than prior versions if there is any packet
loss between Arachne and the server.  One of the changes I made for WATTCP
9911A greatly improved performance in the presence of dropped packets, and
Arachne is now using the 9911A release of WATTCP.