On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:06:37 +0000, Michael L. Dawley wrote: ---------snip---------- > Really, my post was intended to show that 1.60b1 (perhaps) > can make a "slower" computer keep up with or outrun one that > has, in this case, a lot of $ thrown at it to beef it up. > (I've since learned not to do that<g>) > I've really taken to the PS/1, since I obtained it for $5.00, > and from time to time, it's the favorite in the room. > I was taken aback when the Tandy showed it up<g>. Michael .......my preferred machine is a 486DLC40, with 32Mb RAM, and 160B1 is MUCH faster and performs smoother on it than 150src. .......gregy -- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Christoph Belitz
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems tmueller
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Clarence Verge
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Roger Turk
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Clarence Verge
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Clarence Verge
- Arachne 1.61 problems Michael D Hildenbrand
- Arachne speeds (Was Re: Arachne 1.61... Gregory J. Feig
- Arachne speeds (Was Re: Arachne ... Clarence Verge
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Michael L. Dawley
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Willy & Danielle Hoogstraten
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Michael D Hildenbrand
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Dale Mentzer
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Eric S. Emerson
- Re: Arachne 1.61 problems Willy & Danielle Hoogstraten
