Clarence!

How *dare* you imply that I would ever contaminate anything I put my
blood sweat and tears into by putting javascript into it!!

It AIN'T so!  It is about as pure HTML as it can be.  You'd better
appologize right now!!!

That image [fancy hr] will be corrected.  It was one of the first things
I put in and I was using my "tiny pixels" mode at the time.  It's easy
enough to do.

The page may be a bit complex, but since I'm still learning I'm having
to use what I know to accomplish what I want.  If you'd told me two days
ago I would be putting multiple table on a page and configuring multiple
cells in a table, I would have told you you were crazy!  A girl's got to
do what a girl's got to do.

I'm sorry NS isn't working right.  The background color is now coded
correctly and shows up just fine for me ... Anyone!  Any other troubles
with the background now???

l.d.
====

On Thu, 08 Jun 2000 14:18:51 -0500, Clarence Verge wrote:
> You should always design for 640x480. It is the ONLY standard. IMO.
> Pages designed for that format should look fine in any other.

> Re: your new page. Javascript ? You should be ashamed of yourself. <g>

> You have an img with a defined width of 700.
> Please reduce it to 600 or make it a percentage if that is legal.

> In Netscape, when viewed with the DEFAULT background the text is white
> on WHITE in both NS2.02 and NS3.04.
--
Learn about B'FOR
Join B'FOR - B'mothers For Open Records
"http://www.angelfire.com/oh3/lstewart/b-for.htm"
[Associate members of triad also welcome; membership confidential.]


-- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/

Reply via email to