On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 02:26:18 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I hardly ever use Insight because each message is placed in an
> individual file with a name of the form (eight digits).CNM, and
> the 8 digits are cryptic. With the heavy traffic on Arachne and
> herb lists, the number of files becomes huge.
Thanks, Thomas, for bringing up this point. In order to keep things
accessible, after every mail session I use Volkov to view and rename
the *.CNMs. *However*, I'm sure that I would like to face an F2-type
promt, every time I hit the "Archive" button. Of course, one *can* hit
F2 if one wishes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pete Randolph
Morristown Corners, Vermont
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-- Arachne V1.64, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Clarence Verge
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? L.D. Best
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Clarence Verge
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? L.D. Best
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? L.D. Best
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Bastiaan Edelman
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Bastiaan Edelman
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Bastiaan Edelman
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Kali McLaughlin
- Re: Why I dont like insight-type mailers Pete
- Re: Why I dont like insight-type mailers Thomas Mueller
- Re: Why I dont like insight-type mailers Clarence Verge
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Pete
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Bastiaan Edelman
