On Sun, 09 Jul 2000 11:57:07 -0500, "Pete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Howard, > IMHO Insight is fine. Most of the minor problems I have experienced > seem to be hardware/humanware related ;-) > One minor feature that I frequently fell prey to is its habit of > replying to the FROM address, rather tham the REPLY TO address. Thanks > to the generosity of Clarence, I am using an idiot-proof version of > Insight now, and would be happy to pass it on if this bug bothers you, > too. Yes, yes ... the to/from bug bothers me too. Bastiaan > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Pete Randolph > Morristown Corners, Vermont > ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Clarence Verge
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Clarence Verge
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? L.D. Best
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Clarence Verge
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? L.D. Best
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? L.D. Best
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Bastiaan Edelman
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Bastiaan Edelman
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Bastiaan Edelman
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Kali McLaughlin
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Pete
- Re: Why I dont like insight-type mailers Thomas Mueller
- Re: Why I dont like insight-type mailers Clarence Verge
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Pete
- Re: How reliable is insight now, really? Bastiaan Edelman
