Hi Pete,
I didn't say IE3.03 was any better. If what
you say is true, then IE is probably harder on the HD.
It has been my experience that most WINware that I've
used abuses the HD when there is insufficient memory
cache-ing.
Eric
Pete Randolph wrote:
>On Sat, 5 Aug 2000 08:52:00 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric S. Emerson)
>wrote:
>> As Michael Polak has said, it is very hard on your
>> hard drive to run Arachne without using a ramdisk.
>> Verrrryyy Harddddd !!!!
>
>> Eric
>
>Hi Eric,
> When first trying A161 (that was on HD), it didn't seem to make as
>much noise as IE3.03. Maybe that was only because IE ran faster.
>
--
__________
| Ayrx |__\_ Eric S. Emerson
| E-male:~_: ! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`~(*)~~~~(*)~' `````````````````````````
