Ron, etc
No, it *shouldn't* have anything to do with files remaining in the
cache.
One thing I checked, when the files produced ended up being identical,
was the time stamp on the file in my TEMP directory. The time stamp
changed, which means the previous qs.zip file had been overwritten.
The two attachments I received did, therefore, unencode to two separate
files that just happened to have the same name.
Anyone wanting to check this more easily could choose to rename the
first file decoded and resting in the TEMP directory; they could then
*see* when the 2nd file decoded.
l.d.
====
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 09:49:13 +0000, "Edenyard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 23:27:40 -0400 Clarence Verge wrote:
>> I sent 1 with A1.66 and 1 with A1.62.
>> I specifically noted when I checked my OUTBOX that both files were
>> marked as encoded Base64. The intent was to re-check the encoding
>> type at the receiving end.
>> (....)
>> Someone is hallucinating here and I don't think it's me this time.
> This isn't something to do with files remaining in the cache, is it?
--
Learn about B'FOR
Join B'FOR - B'mothers For Open Records
<a href="http://www.b-for.org">B'FOR web site</a>
[Associate members of triad also welcome; membership confidential.]
Every member counts! We need numbers to produce valid statistics.
-- Arachne V1.64, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
