Constant wrote:
>Is there somebody who could give me an idea from where this size difference
>is coming?
Sure, it may:
1. be packed
2. not the be the best compiled version. Toni Lopez originally only
distrubted epppd[d] versions that didn't have PAP/CHAP support claiming
that it wasn't common (I do wonder how weird ISPs he has known about -
they've always been the most common here, or perhaps it's the Swedish ISPs
that's been weird?)
>Is it possible to make this
>packet size smaller for Arachne in order to overcome the connection
>difficulties and line noise problems that I have with Arachne. It is not
>directly falling asleep but sometimes I could really use some acceleration
>;-).
Well let's see if I can get it right this time (I was wrong and L.D right
some months ago <g>). To do that you'll need to change pppdrc.cfg and set
"mtu" and "mru" to the values you want. Now this will not be easy (or
actually doable) with Arachne as it is. Perhaps another thing to change in
Arachne as well? Use the default mtu/mru values unless the user has changed
them?
Another thing to change is the FIFO trigger level, this isn't possible with
any EPPPD version except the one I'm working on, however recent problems
have made the development halt a little (I actually assumed it would be
finished by now at the latest).
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS programs, Star Wars ...
