Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2000 07:40:12 EDT, Thomas J. Tabler wrote:
>
> > I have enabled Cachetemp2=yes and am using a small ramdisk {760K}
>
> OK,
> Right there is the problem.
> With Cache2Temp Yes and only a 760kb RamDisk as the %TEMP% dir....
> you're filling-up the %TEMP% before the file has been decoded.
> (or encoded if it's one that you are preparing to send)
>
> Change to "Cache2Temp No" and be sure that your Cache directory is pointed
> at a HardDrive with enough free space to do the Encoding/decoding.
>
> Or you can leave "Cache2Temp Yes" but point the %TEMP% to the HDD.
But that defeats the purpose of Cache2Temp, Yes ?
If %TEMP% is on HD then Cache2Temp might as well be No.
I have never found much more than 100k in TEMP. I don't know if the files
used for encoding/decoding go to TEMP but surely 700k is adequate for mail ?
I think only transient stuff goes to TEMP.
I could be wrong, as I didn't even TRY to look at the source, but logic
and Michael's past description of the use of TEMP makes me think I might
be right. I'll try later tonite to encode a bunch of big zips and see
what happens.
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
