On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:49:28PM +0200, Bernie wrote: > Casper wrote: > >But it is in the filename, the full filename that is. > >It's not ls, it's really /bin/ls , it's in /bin so it is executable. > >That is one of the benefits of the "weird" directory structure. > > Ok, what about ~/arachne-1.66b/arachne (ok, this might not be the correct > path since I haven't installed it) then? User installed programs are not in > the /bin (or /sbin or /usr/bin) directories, so I guess the user shouldn't > install any programs then. How's that for "freedom of choice" ;-) They should be there. It's Michaels fault Arachne doesn't follow the scheme. Virtually any other package does use this structure. -- Casper Gielen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- It was a user's "club", ... in the sense of the "club" being a large stick usefull for beating IBM about the head with. Frank Wagner
