On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:54:11 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
>
> >> I went off half-cocked there: that included the download time !
> >> But I was pretty sure it didn't when I wrote it. arrrrrgggh :-\
>
> > Well, download times and display times are still irrelevant
> > if only a select few can actually see the image.
>
> Yeah, I guess you're right.
>
> There are only a "select few" users who are likely to have an unzipping
> program on their HDD. <g>
>
> And then of coarse there are even fewer who might have a program
> capable of viewing a .BMP <g>
Ok, so I'm now the one who slightly mis-spoke. I should have
said download times are irrelevant if you have to go through a
lot of post-download rigamarole to actually view it. ;-)
- Steve
