>NT as a web-browser is a bit of a joke. It *can* display images (I think)
>but is basically a text-only browser (and not too good at that).
>
>I use it solely for email and NGs (at which it is superb, IMO) but Arachne
>is the only DOS browser worthy of the name to my knowledge.
>
>(Have you thought about Linux?)
>
>Mike
There is another respectable DOS browser, Lynx386, not graphic though it can
display graphics on a separate screen when used with a graphic viewer like
Pictview.
http://www.rahul.net/dkaufman/
Linux has a whole lot better choice of Internet applications, including Web
browsers, than does DOS. In addition to the budding Arachne, there is Amaya,
Arena (lame duck?), Netscape, Emacs W3, Lynx, Chimera (also lame duck?)
