No it isn't Clarence ... what is there is a single very large BMP file
which contains a 320x240 rendition of the 640x480 original file. AND if
you then crop the screenshot to just show the BMP, there is absolutely
positively no guarantee that it will be 320x240. :> If you want it
320x240 you might be better off working with the original to begin with.
l.d.
====
On Tue, 06 Mar 2001 02:18:28 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2001 00:00:08 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
>> Since it is never really "at the new size" it would be pretty damn hard
>> to save it, Glenn or no Glenn.
> I beg to differ.
> If I take a 640x480 screenshot and tell Arachne to display it at
> 320x240, it does EXACTLY that. I shows every second pixel for a
> total width of 320 pixels.
> If I take a screenshot of the result - fullscreenmode - no scrollbars -
> the result is a .BMP which is 75% black plus it includes the 320x240
> desired image. The fact that the header is wrong for my purposes and
> there are a lot of unnecessary bytes full of nothing in the file is
> mostly irrelevant.
> The "resized" .BMP is in there. <G>
> - Clarence Verge
> - Still using Arachne V1.62 ....
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
